|
Little has been written about emergency post marks. In searching the three major journals dealing with Canadian philately (BNA Topics, Maple Leaves and the PHSC Journal) only four articles were found.
Bibliography The above articles are available from the Horace W. Harrison Library. The information on this and all my philatelic pages and the items displayed are the result of my membership in the British North America Philatelic Society. If you collect any aspect of Canadian philately you are likely to find membership in this organization a great benefit to you and your collection. To Join According to the excerpted letter above, emergency marks should be found as early as the 1920s. The earliest mark shown here is 1938, the latest is 1972. And these are only from Toronto. Clearly there must be a great many marks yet to be discovered. And for the ambitious, other districts are known to have used emergency marks. Emergency marks are erroneously listed as railway post office marks (RPOs) in the catalogs and handbooks. The letter reported by Lussey (1982) (see right) states the various reasons for issuing epos. No railroad connection is noted. Many of the marks shown here were likely applied outside Toronto - so why would I shown them as part of my Toronto post mark collection. While these marks were not always used in Toronto, the hammers were sent or authorized from Toronto and returned to the Toronto District office when their use elsewhere was completed and the Toronto District office was in Toronto (see cover of Sep 17, 1953 below). This makes them a legitimate part of any collection of Toronto post marks. Each type of handstamp (MOTO, Registered Box, Circular Date Stamp) has been assigned a number. I know of at least No 1, No 2, No 3 and No 4. It appears that as the use for these hammers passed the hammer was returned to the District Manager for use in other locations. Thus the handstamp numbers are no indication of the sequence of emergencies. An examination of the use of these devices below will demonstrate this last conclusion. Covers are shown in chronological order |
Proof strikes of Toronto District EPOs
|
|
26 March 1938 -- no origin indicated
|
|
Gelert ON
Envelope was first flight cover from Three Rivers to Quebec.
|
Google Maps |
|
Cedarville ON
A note on the back of the envelope indicates this letter is related to the Cedarville fire. |
Google Maps |
The closeness of the dates on this group of envelopes suggests
they may have originated from the same office in the Winston Park
Downsview area. The various rates also suggests this area was close
enough to Toronto for people to THINK they were entitled to use the
the drop letter rate, they were actually entitled to use the drop-letter
rate or that they could get away with the drop-letter rate.
|
9 August 1955 - no origin indicated
Possibly a letter indicating the emergency hammer had been received? |
|
Scarboro ON
EPO likely applied at Scarboro. Pay 5¢ first class rate and 20¢ registry fee for values $25.00 or less |
Google Maps |
|
9 August 1958 - no origin indicated
|
|
14 August 1958 - no origin indicated
Note that the dater now has month as a Roman numeral. |
Compare the strikes
of the letter above and below. Looks as if they were applied
by the same person within a very short period of time.
Toronto 7 is what they have in common.
Is it possible Mrs Sisson mailed the letter from Beaverton,
or did M. Prophet forget to apply postage in Beaverton and
Toronto 7 caught it and applied the mark?
|
Beaverton ON
Was this EPO applied at Beaverton? |
Google Maps |
|
14 October 1972 - no origin indicated
Possibly from Waubaushene? (see below). |
|
Waubaushene ON
|
Google Maps |
Updated information may be sent to: C. Livermore at: